N-Back Task

Study the ability to recognize items that have been presented n-steps before

The n-back memory task requires subjects to recognize items that have been presented n-steps before. Since subjects must memorize the sequence of items in order to discover those repetitions that span multiple items, the task has strong face validity for being a working memory task. However, the correlation with working memory span is very low which suggests that performance in this task mostly relies on recognition of previously presented items instead of free recall which is required in the memory span task. When introducing “lures” – items that repeat but at a shorter step rate than asked for, subjects produce more false alarms (see Kane et al.)

The n-back task is especially useful in brain stimulation for functional brain imaging studies since the memory work load is induced by instruction while keeping the stimulus material identical. Depending on the instruction, subjects may have to remember the immediate predecessor (1-back) or items further steps before.

The performance in n-back task is measured either as response latency to targets or by applying dependent variables of signal detection theory such as hit, false alarm, correct rejections, and misses. With increasing N the performance level deteriorates both in response latency and in signal discrimination. The n-back task is used in clinical populations for diagnostics and training.

You can configure the n-back task to use different stimulus material. Depending on the type of stimulus material, different regions are activated for verbal vs. spatial memory (see Owen et al.).


Jonides J, Schumacher EH, Smith EE, Lauber EJ, Awh E, Minoshima S, Koeppe RA (1997): Verbal working memory load affects regional
brain activation as measured by PET. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 462– 475.

Kane, M. J., Conway, A. R. A., Miura, T. K., & Colflesh, G. J. (2007). Working memory, attention control, and the N-back task: a question of construct validity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(3), 615-622.

Owen, A. M., McMillan, K. M., Laird, A. R., & Bullmore, E. (2005). N-back working memory paradigm: A meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 25, 46-59.



Configuration Options

Stimuli : Letters  | Words | Pictures | Patterns | Locations
N-Back Task : 1 – 4
Response Type : Choice Rt (type B)| Go/No-go Task (type C)
Pace : Self-paced | Max Rt
Stimulus Time : Display time of each item in msec
ISI : Inter Stimulus Time in msec
Block Structure : Total number of trials, Number of targets, Number of lures
Block Mode : Training | Valid
Randomization : Random | Same as previous block | Fixed Rnd Seed
Timing : Presentation of item in ms, Inter-trial-interval in ms
Feedback : None | Wrong | Display History